Happy New Year

As 2009 draws to a close and we head into 2010, The Will Centre Team would like to wish you a Happy New Year.

We have some very exciting developments to announce in 2010 but in the meantime we hope you enjoy the remainder of the festive break.

Alan, Barry, Mandy & Ray.

A New Tax Year, a New IHT nil-rate band

The 6th April 2009, is the start of the new tax year. The Inheritance Tax (IHT) Nil-rate Band increases from £312,000 to £325,000 per individual.

An increase of £13,000 in the band at an IHT rate of 40% means a potential additional IHT saving in the new tax year of £5,200 for an individual and £10,400 for a married couple or registered civil partnership where the survivor is able to claim both their own and the transferable nil-rate band.

The nil-rate band is due to increase to £350,000 per individual on 6th April 2010, but with the current economic situation and a budget due soon it may be that this increase is under threat.

For advice on saving IHT or using the transferable nil-rate band option please contact The Will Centre on 01752-607040.

Probate Scams

Please be aware that there are currently several Probate scams in operation via the Internet. Many of these will inform the recipient that they are the beneficiary of a substantial legacy but will ask for fees and/or taxes in advance of sending more information or the release of funds.

These will always be fraudulent and on no account should you make any payment or transfer any funds. You can obtain further information and advice concerning such scams on www.met.police.uk/fraudalert You will also find information about reporting such activity to the police, as the police may be able to close down the e-mail accounts concerned.

Alan Porter, of The Will Centre, says this follows the typical scam tricks of enticing you to part with money up front. Of course you never should have to pay up front as a reputable firm will take any fees from the estate of the deceased. The Office of Fair Trading also has information on scams at http://www.oft.gov.uk/oft_at_work/consumer_initiatives/scams/

If you need advice on Probate then please call The Will Centre on 01752-607040. We offer a FREE, no obligation, 30 minute interview at our offices.

HMRC Phishing Attack

Banks have been made aware of the following phishing attack on HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

A bogus email claiming to be from HMRC is telling recipients they are due a tax refund and asking for account or credit card details so that a (fictitious) tax refund can be paid.

HMRC have confirmed that they will only ever contact customers in writing to confirm tax refunds.

Should you receive such an email, do not open, click on the website link or provide any confidential details and immediately forward it to phishing@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk for investigation.

Happy Christmas/New Year

Cleaner fails to clean up Will properly!

A CLEANER who faked her landlord's will to make herself the sole beneficiary of his £125,000 estate was last night behind bars. Ilona Zimon, of Oxford, faked Dusan Duvnjak's will to eliminate his two children and make herself the only heir to his three houses, car and other belongings.

The 50-year-old also changed all references to herself in the will as Mr Duvnjak's "beloved partner" and ordered her name should be the only one included on his headstone.
Mr Duvnjak's family became suspicious after Zimon faxed them a copy of the will shortly after his death in January 2006 showing his two children - Marko, 23, and Mara, 25 - had been disinherited.

They employed a handwriting expert who examined the document and found Mr Duvnjak's signature was an exact copy of the one on the original will - something that is impossible to recreate naturally and could only be done by photocopying or tracing. Mr Duvnjak's ex-wife Diane, the mother of his two children, said her former husband's houses had been worth about £650,000 but were heavily mortgaged. he 51-year-old, of Shelford Place, Headington, said it had been a battle to prove the will was a fake. She said: "It is an embarrassment to have to go through all of this. It is very personal. It is a disbelief that somebody would take a person that is so vulnerable and say that they cared for him and yet hurt the people that he actually cared most about. People do make ad-hoc wills, but this was a document of such appalling taste that it actually made some members of the family feel like they were going to vomit."

Builder and decorator Mr Duvnjak, known as Denis, died in January 2006 from a fall after a long battle with alcoholism. His brother David, 62, added he believed Zimon had been planning the will forgery for years. He said: "I thought that was the only reason she was living with him. I am pleased justice has been done." Zimon had denied forgery but was convicted by a jury after a trial at Oxford Crown Court last month.

Alistair Grainger, defending, said Zimon had no previous convictions and was believed by many of her employers to be trustworthy. Sentencing her to 12 months' jail, Judge Patrick Eccles said: "What is plain is that the family were deeply distressed at having their names taken off the headstone. The court has to take a serious view of this offence because a will is a public document in which the public have to have trust. You photocopied the signature on the original will. You were due to inherit 20 per cent but plainly were not satisfied. You were not under financial or psychological pressure and therefore, based on the jury's verdict, I must find that you did it out of greed."

The jury cleared Zimon's co-accused, Soossapillai Ramesh, 44, of Peckham Rye, London, of forging a will. Speaking after the case, Det Con Mark Lacey said it was the first case involving a forged will that anyone at Oxford CID could remember. He said: "I think the sentence shows that the courts have taken attempts to forge wills very seriously."

The amount of money a spouse receives if their partner dies without making a will could increase, the government announced in 2005.

If a person with children dies without leaving a will, their surviving spouse will receive only the first £125,000 of their estate. If there are no children but there are surviving parents or siblings the spouse will receive £200,000.

The Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) estimates that under the intestacy rules, in up to 9,000 cases each year a surviving spouse will not receive all of their partner's estate.

In 4,000 of these cases, the family home may have to be sold, so that money from the estate can be paid to the children or other relatives.

A consultation paper published in 2005 by the DCA proposed that the limits be increased so that, where children are involved, a spouse can receive £350,000 of an estate and where there are no surviving children they can receive £650,000.

"The death of a spouse is always a traumatic event, but can be particularly so where they die without leaving a will," said the minister for civil justice, Baroness Ashton in 2005. "In these cases, the financial future of the widow or widower and any children will depend on how much money they can inherit under the intestacy rules."

The consultation paper suggests that the payment levels in 2005, which were set in 1993, may now be out of date, primarily due to the increase in house prices. According to 2005 figures the average house price now stands at £162,411 - some way above the £125,000 limit.

However, the DCA is concerned about cases where the legacy paid to the surviving spouse could mean that there are no funds left to distribute to any children. This can be particularly contentious when the deceased has children from an earlier relationship.

In 1993, more than 90% of estates were worth less than £125,000 and 98% of estates were valued at under £200,000. In 2005 these figures are 59% and 79% respectively.

Research carried out in March 2005 by insurer Standard Life suggested that 57% of adults in the UK had not drawn up a will, including 40% of people with homes worth more than £150,000.

So what has happened since this was proposed in 2005. Alan Porter, of The Will Centre, says “Nothing at all has changed! The levels set in 1993 and that were being reviewed in 2005 still apply! If you consider it is almost impossible to buy a house for under £125,000 you can see that there is a real problem. The best way to avoid any problems is to make a Will.”